|
|
Rethinking Resistance to Corporate RuleIntroductionBold Responses to Corporations Which Chronically Break the Law Challenging Public/Corporate Partnerships Communities Organizing to Defend Themselves Against Corporate Power Prohibiting (or Defining) Corporate Involvement in Particular Industries Revoking Corporate Charters Rewriting State Corporate Codes Challenging Corporate Claims to Constitutional Rights From Corporate Ownership to Public Ownership Educating Citizens About Our History and Beginning to Reclaim Our Culture and Our Language • The American Independent Business Alliance (AMIBA) unites independent businesses to compete effectively against corporate chain stores. The first IBA was launched in Boulder and their work included proposing the ‘Community Vitality Act’ to the Boulder City Council. This legislation did not pass but is a model that helps demolish the myth of the "business interest" by supporting alliances among small businesses that are victims of corporate chain stores. To read the text of the proposed ordinance click here. • A number of years ago, the town of Jay, Maine passed an ordinance which gave the town the power to license, monitor and enforce the same environmental regulations that the state Dept of Environmental Protection, and the federal E.P.A. do. In the town is a pulp & paper mill owned by International Paper company. The full text of the Jay Environmental Control and Improvement Ordinance is not online yet but may be obtained by contacting the Town of Jay, 99 Main Street, Jay, Maine 04239-1697, Tel: 207-897-6785. • The San Francisco County Board of Supervisors has passed a law
requiring all corporations doing business in the county to offer full
benefits for same-sex partners. It has already withstood a court challenge.
Minneapolis and about a half dozen other cities have passed similar ordinances.
To read a PDF of the ordinance click
here. • The Institute for Local Self Reliance (ILSR) in Minnesota launched the ‘New Rules Project’, which helps local communities to organize against the ravages of absentee corporate decision making by “identifying the rules that could close the gap between those who make the decisions and those who feel the impacts – new rules that could bring both authority and responsibility to the local level.”
|
|
Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County | P.O. Box 610, Eureka, California, 95502 | info@DUHC.org | (707) 269-0984
|
||
Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County is a project of the California Center for Community Democracy |
||