|
|
Rethinking Resistance to Corporate RuleIntroductionBold Responses to Corporations Which Chronically Break the Law Challenging Public/ Corporate Partnerships Local Communities Organizing to Defend Themselves Against Corporate Power Prohibiting (or Defining) Corporate Involvement in Particular Industries Revoking Corporate Charters Rewriting State Corporate Codes Amending State Constitutions Challenging Corporate Claims to Constitutional Rights Educating Citizens About Our History and Beginning to Reclaim Our Culture and Our Language • Nine states have banned non-family-owned corporations from engaging in farming or ranching, or owning farmland. Nebraska (‘Initiative 300’ - 1982), South Dakota (‘Amendment E’ - 1998), achieved their success through ballot initiatives which amended their state constitutions. Unfortunately, the South Dakota amendment was declared unconstitutional by a Federal Circuit Court in 2003. Similar measures have been achieved by Pennsylvania townships through ordinances passed by township governments. A number of the PA townships are also discussing similar legislation which would ban corporate logging or forest land ownership. To view the text of the Southampton Anti-Corporate Farming Ordinance (PA) click here. • In Sonoma County, CA, the Occidental
Arts and Ecology Center's 'Food Systems, Corporations and Democracy
Program' has two local projects aimed at shifting local decision making
from the realm of private, property-based, corporate, "market"
decisions to the realm of public, democratic decisions focused on the
"commonwealth": • Many cities in the US have passed resolutions against genetically engineered (GE) crops – Cleveland, Boston, San Francisco, Austin, Minneapolis and many other smaller towns. These resolutions are largely non-binding but they are a potential first step toward enacting policy to ban planting of GE crops. The city of Boulder has a policy that bans GE crops from city-owned land. Citizens in Mendocino County, CA are gathering signatures for a ballot initiative that would ban growing genetically engineered crops. • In 2002, the Arcata City on Democracy and Corporations (instituted by Measure F: the Arcata Advisory Measure on Democracy and Corporations) proposed its first legislation to the Arcata City Council. The ordinance called for a cap on the number of "formula" (chain) restaurants in the city. The measure prohibits further expansion of corporate chain restaurants and ensures that no such restaurants can be developed in the downtown area. The Committee is currently working with Arcata Main Street (an organization that advocates on behalf of downtown businesses) to ascertain if there is citizen support to expand the ordinance to include chain retail establishments as well. For a PDF of the ordinance on formula restaurants click here.
|
|
Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County | P.O. Box 610, Eureka, California, 95502 | info@DUHC.org | (707) 269-0984
|
||
Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County is a project of the California Center for Community Democracy |
||